Beneficiary, Dependant or Next-of-Kin Nomination Record

Populated beneficiary and dependant nominations held by superannuation funds and employers: binding and non-binding (including lapsing and non-lapsing) death benefit nominations under Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 reg 6.17A (made for SIS Act 1993 s 59(1A)), employer group life insurance beneficiary nominations, and HR dependant, next-of-kin and emergency contact records. Each record ties an identified member or employee to named family members, their relationship to the member and, on death benefit forms, the share each person receives, witness details and dates of birth. Bulk member extracts with TFNs and balances belong to superannuation-fund-member-statement-bulk, and super identifiers (USI, member number) on their own belong to global-top500-096-superannuation-identifiers.

Type: regex
Engine: boost_regex
Confidence: medium
Confidence justification: Medium: nomination forms and dependant records are dense labelled forms, and the enforce tiers need a populated member field plus a named beneficiary with a relationship, which PDS text, policies and blank forms do not carry. Name and relationship shapes are loose, so HR contact lists and insurance correspondence with the same labels can reach 75, and a member date of birth can lift an emergency contact record to 85. 85/75 are heuristic evidence tiers, not measured accuracy; test values are synthetic records laid out like fund nomination forms and HR dependant records.
Jurisdictions: au
Regulations: Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth), Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld)
Frameworks: ISO 27001, ISO 27701, QGISCF
Data categories: pii, financial, employment
Scope: narrow
Risk rating: 7
Platform compatibility: Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Unsupported, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Degraded, Netskope: Unsupported

Pattern

(?i)\b(?:(?:binding|non-binding|non-lapsing|lapsing)\s+(?:death\s+benefit\s+)?nomination|death\s+benefit\s+nomination|nomination\s+of\s+(?:beneficiar(?:y|ies)|dependa[en]ts?)|beneficiary\s+(?:nomination|designation)|(?:preferred|reversionary)\s+beneficiar(?:y|ies)|(?:life\s+insurance|group\s+life|death\s+benefit)\s+beneficiar(?:y|ies)|dependa[en]t(?:s|['’]s)?\s+(?:details|declaration|information|record|form)|next\s+of\s+kin\s+(?:details|information|record|form|nomination)|emergency\s+contact\s+(?:details|information|record|form))\b

Corroborative evidence keywords

trustee, superannuation, death benefit, legal personal representative, witness, lapse, group life, insured, relationship to member, dependant

Proximity: 300 characters

Should match

Binding death benefit nomination Member name: Casey Teston Member number: 40017382 Beneficiary 1 full name: Alex Teston Relationship to member: spouse Share of benefit: 70% Beneficiary 2 full name: Jamie Teston Relationship to member: son Share of benefit: 30% Witness 1 full name: Robin Carrowby Date witnessed: 12/09/2026 — 85 tier - binding nomination with member name and number, two named beneficiaries with relationships, shares and witness details
Group life insurance - beneficiary nomination Employee number: 204511 Employee name: Morgan Teston Name Relationship Date of birth Share Alex Teston Spouse 12/03/1985 60% Ari Teston Daughter 02/05/2015 40% — 85 tier - employer group life nomination with employee fields and a tab table of beneficiaries with relationship, date of birth and share
Next of kin details Employee: Riley Teston Employee number: 700231 Next of kin: Dana Teston (partner) Phone: 07 5550 1234 — 75 tier - HR next of kin record with a populated employee and a named next of kin with relationship, no share or date of birth
Non-binding nomination Member: Sam Teston Nominee: Jordan Teston, relationship: son The trustee will consider this nomination when paying the death benefit. — 75 tier - non-binding nomination with member and nominee plus relationship
Dependant details Employee ID: 55120 Dependant 1 name: Ari Teston Relationship: daughter DOB: 02/05/2015 — 85 tier - HR dependant record with employee ID, named dependant, relationship and date of birth

Should not match

Death benefit nominations. You can make a binding death benefit nomination directing the trustee to pay your benefit to your dependants or legal personal representative. The nomination must be signed and dated in the presence of two witnesses aged 18 or over who are not named in it, and it lapses after three years. See section 7 of this PDS. — Fund PDS text explaining nominations (65 at most)
Binding death benefit nomination Member name: ______________ Member number: ______________ Beneficiary 1 full name: ______________ Relationship to member: ______________ Share: ___% Witness declaration: We declare that this notice was signed by the member in our presence. — Blank nomination form (65 at most)
Emergency contact details policy. This policy applies to all staff. Employees must keep their emergency contact details and next of kin information up to date in the HR portal, for example a spouse, partner or parent who can be reached during work hours. — HR policy on emergency contacts (65 at most)
Super funds urged members to review their binding death benefit nominations after a court found a lapsed nomination invalid, leaving the benefit to the trustee's discretion. — News article
Emergency contact form - use this template for new starters. Employee: Riley Teston Emergency contact: Dana Teston (partner) — Fixture wording (template exclusion)

Known false positives

Superannuation fund PDS documents, member guides and fact sheets that explain binding and non-binding nominations, witness rules and lapsing. Mitigation: Guidance names the fields without values and stays at 65 discovery; "this PDS / guide / fact sheet" wording and legislation markers are excluded from enforce tiers.
Blank nomination forms and dependant / next of kin forms. Mitigation: Member and beneficiary fields reject blank lines, bracket placeholders and n/a / tbc values; fixture wording is excluded by the shared template-exclusion dictionary.
HR policies and onboarding instructions about emergency contacts. Mitigation: No populated employee field and named contact with relationship, so these stay at 65; "this policy applies" wording is excluded.
HR contact lists and insurance correspondence that name a member and a relative with the same labels. Mitigation: These are still personal information about family relationships; accept at 75 or tune the relationship list locally.