Queensland Development Application Submission Submitter Details (Redaction Aid)

Submitter names and contact details in submissions about Queensland development applications, submission summaries in assessment reports, and decision notices that list principal submitters. Under the Planning Act 2016 sch 2, a properly made submission must state the name and residential or business address of all submission-makers and one postal or electronic address for service. Section 63(2)(h) requires the decision notice to state the name, residential or business address and electronic address of each principal submitter. Planning Regulation 2017 sch 22 s 5(1)(d) requires the assessment manager to keep any properly made submission available for inspection and purchase. These documents are public by law. Many councils redact submitters' contact details before publishing online, but that is council practice, not a verified statutory requirement. This is a discovery-only redaction aid. It surfaces documents that carry submitter details so they can be reviewed before publication. It is not a blocking classifier.

Type
regex
Engine
boost_regex
Confidence
medium
Confidence justification
Medium. Submission and submitter wording plus a populated name or contact field and planning context is a reliable signal for submitter details. However, the documents are public by law, so the classifier only flags them for redaction review at 65. The recommended confidence is 65 and there are no enforce tiers. 65 is a heuristic evidence tier, not measured accuracy. Test values are synthetic.
Jurisdictions
au, au-qld
Regulations
Planning Act 2016 (Qld), Planning Regulation 2017 (Qld), Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld)
Frameworks
QGISCF
Data categories
pii, contact-information, government
Scope
narrow
Risk rating
3
Platform compatibility
Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Compatible, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Degraded, Netskope: Unsupported

Pattern

(?i)\b(?:properly\s+made\s+submissions?|(?:principal\s+)?submitters?|submission-makers?|submissions?\s+(?:about|on|regarding|in\s+relation\s+to|objecting\s+to|in\s+support\s+of|against|for)\s+(?:the\s+|this\s+)?(?:proposed\s+)?(?:development(?:\s+application)?|application|DA)|objections?\s+to\s+(?:the\s+|this\s+)?(?:proposed\s+)?(?:development(?:\s+application)?|application|DA)|development\s+application\s+submissions?)\b

Corroborative evidence keywords

development application, Planning Act 2016, assessment manager, public notification, material change of use, planning scheme, decision notice

Proximity: 300 characters

Should match

Should not match

Known false positives

References