Queensland Public Sector Selection Report and Candidate Assessment
Recruitment and selection records under the Recruitment and Selection Directive 07/23 (Public Sector Act 2022 (Qld) ss 46 and 222): selection panel reports, comparative and merit assessments documenting why the proposed successful applicant is "best suited", candidate scoring and ranking sheets, referee checks and panel recommendations for a named candidate and position. Council and university selection reports with the same structure are also caught. Overlaps global-top500-074-interview-evaluation-notes (generic phrase classifier being rebuilt separately).
- Type
- regex
- Engine
- boost_regex
- Confidence
- medium
- Confidence justification
- Medium: selection report, comparative assessment and best suited are the directive's own terms, but they also fill the directive, recruitment guidance and job advertisements (which carry position numbers and classifications), so a job-ad exclusion is applied and 85 needs candidate, score and recommendation structures together. Position numbers and job references are agency-defined and are label-anchored only. 85/75 are heuristic evidence tiers, not measured accuracy; test values are synthetic selection records.
- Jurisdictions
- au
- Regulations
- Public Sector Act 2022 (Qld), Recruitment and Selection Directive 07/23 (Qld), Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld)
- Frameworks
- QGISCF
- Data categories
- pii, employment
- Scope
- narrow
- Risk rating
- 7
- Platform compatibility
- Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Compatible, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Degraded, Netskope: Unsupported
Pattern
(?i)\b(?:selection\s+(?:panel\s+)?report|selection\s+panel|recruitment\s+and\s+selection\s+(?:report|outcome|decision)|comparative\s+assessment|merit\s+(?:assessment|ranking)|best\s+suited|referee\s+(?:report|check|comments)s?|panel\s+chair(?:person)?|Directive\s+0?7/23)Corroborative evidence keywords
selection report, selection panel, comparative assessment, best suited, referee check, merit, position number, panel chair
Proximity: 300 characters
Should match
SELECTION REPORT Position number: 50012345 Classification: AO6 Applicant: Jordan Testwell Total score: 44/50 Rank: 1 Applicant: Casey Teston Total score: 38/50 Rank: 2 Recommendation: Jordan Testwell is best suited for appointment on merit Panel chair: Riley Testwell, Director Workforce— Selection report with position, candidate scores and ranks, recommendation and panel chair (85 tier)Comparative assessment - Lecturer (Level B) Candidate 1: Priya Testwell - interview rating: highly suitable Candidate 2: Sam Teston - interview rating: suitable Panel recommendation: appoint Priya Testwell to the fixed-term role— University comparative assessment with ratings and panel recommendation (85 tier)Referee report Candidate: Morgan Teston Referee: Alex Testwell (former supervisor, 2024-2026) Comments: reliable, strong written communication.— Referee report with a populated candidate field (75 tier)Selection panel notes - Position number: 30098765 Interviews held 12/09/2026 in the Brisbane office.— Panel notes with a populated position number only (75 tier)
Should not match
The selection panel must document the reasons why the proposed successful applicant was determined to be best suited, including a comparative assessment of the applicants.— Directive 07/23 guidance (65 only)About the role: Senior Policy Officer. Position number: 50012345. Classification: AO6. The selection panel will assess your application against the key capabilities. How to apply: submit a two-page response. Applications close 30/09/2026.— Public job advertisement with a position number (excluded)Selection report Position number: [insert] Applicant: ________ Total score: __/50 Recommendation: <name of recommended applicant>— Blank selection report (65 only)Queensland agencies filled 9,800 roles in 2025-26 and panels continued to appoint the applicant best suited on merit, the Commission reported.— News / statistics (65 only)
Known false positives
- Public job advertisements and role descriptions carry position numbers, classifications and selection panel wording. Mitigation: Advertisement wording (how to apply, applications close, about the role) is excluded; 85 also needs candidate scores and a recommendation, which advertisements never carry.
- Directive 07/23 text, forgov recruitment guidance and training. Mitigation: Enforce tiers need populated candidate or position fields; guidance, FAQ, case study and training wording is excluded.
- Blank selection report and scoring templates. Mitigation: Blank lines, square-bracket and angle-bracket placeholders are rejected; numeric score fields need digits.