NIR Insee
Detects NIR Insee patterns. This pattern is based on a Microsoft Purview built-in sensitive information type. Users already running Purview may prefer to enable the built-in SIT directly, or use this version as a starting point for customisation.
- Type
- regex
- Engine
- universal
- Confidence
- medium
- Confidence justification
- Medium confidence: pattern has structural constraints but corroborative keywords are recommended to reduce false positive rates. Added context gating and exclusion rules improve precision and reduce incidental matches.
- Detection quality
- Verified
- Jurisdictions
- eu, fr
- Regulations
- BDSG, CNIL / LIL, GDPR
- Frameworks
- ISO 27001, ISO 27701
- Data categories
- pii, government-id
- Scope
- narrow
- Risk rating
- 9
- Platform compatibility
- Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Compatible, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Compatible, Netskope: Unsupported
Pattern
\b[12]\d{2}(0[1-9]|1[0-2]|[2-4][0-9])\d{2}(?:\d{3}|2[AB])\d{3}\d{2}\b
Corroborative evidence keywords
identifier, number, ID, ID number, identification, ID card, license, permit, registration, certificate, field, column, row, entry, record, value, form, register, database, extract (+16 more)
Proximity: 300 characters
Should match
185057512345678— Male born 1985 in department 75293019912345612— Female born 1993 in department 99190017512345634— Person born 1990 in department 75
Should not match
3850575123456 78— Invalid gender digit (3 instead of 1 or 2)1851375123456 78— Invalid month (13)185057512345 78— Too few digits in commune/sequence sectiontemplate example placeholder record identifier— Template/sample context should be excluded even when anchor words are present
Known false positives
- Common words and phrases related to nir insee appearing in policy documents, training materials, HR templates, or compliance guidelines without actual personal data. Mitigation: Require corroborative evidence keywords within the proximity window to confirm sensitive data context rather than general discussion.
- In multiple EU languages, similar terminology used in formal or administrative contexts (education, professional documentation) that does not constitute sensitive data collection. Mitigation: Layer with additional contextual signals such as structured identifiers, form fields, or database column headers to distinguish sensitive records from general references.