Cabinet Submission

Identifies substantive Australian federal and state Cabinet submissions, memoranda, and approval papers. Topic phrases are retained for discovery; enforcement requires purpose, recommendation, financial, consultation, implementation, risk, regulatory, or decision-sought sections, and high confidence also requires a formal Cabinet marking, minute, decision, or submission identifier.

Type

regex

Engine

boost_regex

Confidence

medium

Confidence justification

Medium confidence requires substantive submission content rather than a title. High confidence adds formal Cabinet handling or record identifiers.

Jurisdictions

global

Regulations

Criminal Code 1899 (Qld), IPA 2009 (Qld), RTI Act 2009 (Qld)

Frameworks

QGISCF

Data categories

government, cabinet

Scope

narrow

Risk rating

10

Platform compatibility

Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Compatible, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Degraded, Netskope: Unsupported

Pattern

(?is)\b(?:cabinet\s+(?:submission|memorandum|decision|approval)|for\s+cabinet\s+(?:consideration|approval))\b

Should match

• Cabinet submission — Low-tier probe - Cabinet topic without submission content
• Cabinet submission: purpose, recommendations, financial implications, consultation, implementation plan, risks, and decision sought — Medium-tier probe - substantive submission sections without formal marking or identifier
• Cabinet-in-Confidence Cabinet submission number: CAB-2026-104: purpose, recommendations, financial implications, consultation, risks, implementation plan, and decision sought — High-tier probe - substantive submission with Cabinet marking and formal identifier

Should not match

• Kitchen cabinet installation guide — Non-match 1
• The filing cabinet was full — Furniture usage
• The public guide explains how agencies prepare a Cabinet submission. — Public process guidance without a submission record
• Training example: Cabinet-in-Confidence Cabinet submission CAB-2026-104 with recommendations and decision sought — Explicit training content must not enforce

Known false positives

• Public process guidance, historical commentary, and generic policy material discuss Cabinet submissions, recommendations, and decisions without containing a live submission. Mitigation: Keep Cabinet topics discovery-only and require substantive purpose, recommendation, financial, consultation, implementation, risk, regulatory, or decision-sought content.
• Training submissions can contain realistic Cabinet markings, numbers, sections, recommendations, and decisions sought. Mitigation: Reject explicit template, demo, tutorial, sample-data, and training-example framing from enforcing tiers.