Bonus and incentive allocations
Detects bonus and incentive allocations (STI/LTI awards, bonus pool allocations, performance bonuses) for an identified employee or participant, with award amounts, percentage of base, scorecard results or payment dates.
- Type
- regex
- Engine
- boost_regex
- Confidence
- medium
- Confidence justification
- Medium: the primary phrases also appear in policies, guidance, blank forms and news, so enforce tiers require a populated person field and 85 adds a record-specific populated detail plus independent corroboration. Person values are customer-defined (employee IDs, position numbers), so the field regexes use labelled loose values with a placeholder guard. 85/75 are heuristic evidence tiers, not measured accuracy.
- Detection quality
- Not detected
- Jurisdictions
- global
- Regulations
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth), Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld), NDB Scheme (Cth), GDPR
- Frameworks
- ISO 27001, ISO 27701
- Data categories
- pii, employment
- Scope
- wide
- Risk rating
- 8
- Platform compatibility
- Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Compatible, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Degraded, Netskope: Unsupported
Pattern
(?i)\b(?:bonus\s+(?:allocation|pool|payout|award|entitlement|letter)|incentive\s+(?:payment|plan|award|allocation)|performance\s+bonus|(?:short|long)[\s-]+term\s+incentive|variable\s+pay|at[\s-]+risk\s+(?:pay|remuneration))\b
Corroborative evidence keywords
remuneration committee, fixed remuneration, pro rata, eligible, gateway, clawback, payroll, performance year, calibration, KPI
Proximity: 300 characters
Should match
Short-term incentive award letter Participant: Avery Teston Employee ID: 4471820 Target: 15% of base Award value: $18,240 Payment date: 15/09/2026 Approved by the remuneration committee; clawback provisions apply.— 85: STI award letter with participant, target, value and payment datePerformance bonus schedule Employee: Morgan Teston Scorecard result: 112% Amount: USD 9,400 Pro rata for 10 months of the performance year.— 85: Bonus schedule row with scorecard and amountBonus allocation - Sales team Employee name: Jordan Staffson Included in the Q3 allocation list pending sign-off.— 75: Allocation naming the employee, no amount
Should not match
The short-term incentive plan rewards eligible employees. This policy explains how bonus pool funding and gateways work.— Policy text - must stay below 75Bonus allocation form Employee name: __________ Amount: $__________ Payment date: ___/___/____— Blank form - must stay below 75The bank cut its bonus pool by 20% this year, according to a media release.— News / media release - must stay below 75unrelated generic text without domain phrases— No relevant topic phrases presentplaceholder value 12345— Random text should not match topic-specific regexemployee interview— Generic word pair from old broad template should not match
Known false positives
- Policies, directives, fact sheets, guidance and training material that name the record type. Mitigation: Enforce tiers require a populated person field; guidance text has labels without values and guidance/training/media-release framing is excluded.
- Blank forms, templates and HR system configuration. Mitigation: Blank lines, square- and angle-bracket placeholders, XXX and n/a/tbc values are rejected by the placeholder guard; template/fixture words are excluded.
- Aggregate statistics and news reporting. Mitigation: No populated person field, so these stay at 65 discovery.
- Records that identify the person only in free text (no field label) fall to 65. Mitigation: Accepted precision trade-off; extend the person-field regex with the customer employee-id format to recover recall.