Procurement Tender Evaluation with Pricing
Detects weighted evaluation matrices scoring tender responses, including commercial pricing from multiple bidders in government procurement processes.
- Type
- keyword_proximity
- Engine
- universal
- Confidence
- high
- Confidence justification
- High confidence: tender evaluation documents with commercial pricing and probity markers are highly distinctive. The combination of procurement terminology with pricing and confidentiality markers virtually eliminates false positives.
- Jurisdictions
- au
- Regulations
- Financial Accountability Act 2009 (Qld)
- Frameworks
- QGISCF
- Data categories
- financial, government
- Scope
- wide
- Risk rating
- 8
Pattern
QLD-\d{4}-\d{3,6}
Corroborative evidence keywords
tender, procurement, RFT, RFP, ITT, evaluation, assessment, scoring, price, cost, value for money, confidential, PROTECTED, probity, evaluation committee, financial, fiscal, monetary, accounting, treasury (+25 more)
Proximity: 300 characters
Should match
PROTECTED — Tender Evaluation Report. RFT QLD-2026-04521: ICT Infrastructure Services. Evaluation committee scoring: Tenderer A — Technical: 78/100, Price: $14.2M. Tenderer B — Technical: 82/100, Price: $16.8M. Value for money assessment: Tenderer A recommended. Probity advisor: approved.— Tender evaluation with multiple bidder pricing and scoresCommercial-in-Confidence. Procurement evaluation matrix — Road construction RFP. Weighted criteria: Price 40%, Methodology 30%, Experience 30%. Bidder pricing: Company X $45.6M, Company Y $52.1M, Company Z $48.3M. Recommendation to evaluation committee.— Procurement evaluation with competitive pricing comparison
Should not match
Request for Tender: QLD-2026-04521. ICT Infrastructure Services. Submissions close 30 March 2026. Published on QTenders.— Published tender notice — public procurement advertisementProcurement Policy Framework — How to evaluate tenders. Template scoring matrix with example criteria and weightings.— Procurement policy template without real evaluation data
Known false positives
- Published tender notices and procurement advertisements on QTenders Mitigation: Exclude documents containing 'submissions close', 'published on QTenders', 'invitation to tender' without evaluation data
- Procurement policy templates with example scoring matrices Mitigation: Exclude documents containing 'template', 'example', 'how to evaluate', 'policy framework'