Passport
Detects Passport patterns. This pattern is based on a Microsoft Purview built-in sensitive information type. Users already running Purview may prefer to enable the built-in SIT directly, or use this version as a starting point for customisation.
- Type
- regex
- Engine
- universal
- Confidence
- low
- Confidence justification
- Low confidence: generic pattern format that may match unrelated data. Corroborative evidence keywords are essential for reliable detection. Context label evidence plus explicit template/example exclusion improves precision for high-risk identifiers. Added context gating and exclusion rules improve precision and reduce incidental matches.
- Detection quality
- Partial
- Jurisdictions
- uk
- Frameworks
- ISO 27001, ISO 27701
- Data categories
- pii, government-id
- Scope
- wide
- Risk rating
- 8
- Platform compatibility
- Purview: Compatible, GCP DLP: Compatible, Macie: Compatible, Zscaler: Compatible, Palo Alto: Compatible, Netskope: Compatible
Pattern
\b\d{9}\b
Corroborative evidence keywords
passport, passport number, travel document, australian passport, ID number, identification, ID card, license, permit, registration, certificate, field, column, row, entry, record, value, form, register, database (+20 more)
Proximity: 300 characters
Should match
123456789— UK passport number (9 digits)987654321— Alternate UK passport number501234567— Mid-range UK passport number
Should not match
12345678— Only 8 digits instead of 91234567890— 10 digits instead of 912345678A— Contains a letter instead of all digitssample template placeholder number 123456789— Template/sample context should be excluded even when numeric-like values appeartemplate example placeholder record identifier— Template/sample context should be excluded even when anchor words are present
Known false positives
- Common words and phrases related to passport appearing in policy documents, training materials, HR templates, or compliance guidelines without actual personal data. Mitigation: Require corroborative evidence keywords within the proximity window to confirm sensitive data context rather than general discussion.
- In British English, similar terminology used in formal or administrative contexts (education, professional documentation) that does not constitute sensitive data collection. Mitigation: Layer with additional contextual signals such as structured identifiers, form fields, or database column headers to distinguish sensitive records from general references.
- High-frequency pattern matches in large document corpora due to broad regex anchors. Expected match rate is significantly higher than specific identifier patterns. Mitigation: Tune confidence thresholds for bulk scanning. Consider using this pattern primarily as a pre-filter with secondary validation.